Archive for Education

Expelling 7-year-olds

Ofsted report reveals data on very young children excluded from school

(from The Times 24 June, 2009.)

Nothing in this Times article overtly points to a location. Readers must then take their clues from the wider context of who published the article. The publishers are based in England, as printed at the bottom of each of their webpages;

This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England

However, rather than address their content to an English audience, The Times uses ‘Britain’ as its standard term for all things UK, as is customary with all of the ‘national’ UK newspapers. The ‘schools’ and ‘local authorities’ in the report are, then, presumed to be British.

The problem with a news article like this is that the primary source is Ofsted, an education authority that only covers England. The other home countries in the UK have their own education departments. News that is presented as British but is in fact only English is a serious misrepresentation of England’s role in the UK and the reporters are guilty of promoting an Anglo-centric view where other member countries in the UK have no right to a voice.

The BBC in covering the same topic, added just two words to their report: “in England”. Not only does this support the journalistic integrity of the article, it avoids condemning entire nations to an invisible status.

Leave a Comment

Chinese in Scotland

Chinese-science-exams-more-interesting-and-demanding-than-GCSEs

(from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/ 22 June, 2009.)

Maths and science exams taken by students in China are more “interesting and demanding” than their British GCSE counterparts

This sub-heading is confused. The writer used the word ‘British’ either to avoid the wordy ‘English and Welsh counterparts’ or to blanket the whole of the Britain with a system only found in some parts. If ‘GCSE’ had been left out, an astute reader would have questioned if all UK education systems had been compared to the Chinese one. Including ‘GCSE’ limits the comparison to the English (& Welsh) system. Hardly all-encompassing British.

The Royal Society of Chemistry’s stated purpose was to help gather data “to ensure the country has the right skills for the future”. Which ‘country’ is being referred to here, I wonder? My question is answered soon:

The Chinese exam papers in chemistry and maths were taken last year by pupils studying at the same level as England’s GCSE students
(Italics mine)

If there should be any doubt of the existence of the ‘England-as-Britain’ trope, the Telegraph’s use of the terms should put that to bed immediately. Altogether, there are three iterations of ‘English/ England’ and two of ‘Britain’ all used synonymously. The sub-text of this Telegraph article is that the English education system IS the British one.

Education in the United Kingdom is a devolved matter with each of the countries of the United Kingdom having separate systems under separate governments: the UK Government is responsible for education in England, the Scottish Government is responsible for education in Scotland,[1] the Welsh Assembly Government is responsible for education in Wales[2] and the Northern Ireland Executive is responsible for education in Northern Ireland.

Wikipedia does not even begin to address the issue in a single page and immediately refers readers to the relevant separate encyclopedia entries.

As a Scot who worked hard enough to gain four Scottish Highers back in the day, it’s quite galling to (continually) have that system ignored. As a Scot hoping for full independence, the continued separation is a useful seed to plant in preparation for the day that articles like the Telegraph’s one actually has lexical accuracy.

Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.