Murray laments British failings
(from http://news.bbc.co.uk/ 24 June, 2009.)
Not being a tennis buff, I was not aware of any dispute over Elena Baltacha’s nationality. Instead, the BBC’s unbalanced treatment in presenting Andy Murray’s despair at the quality of British tennis talent first drew my attention to a possible identity war over Baltacha. The Beeb define Murray as “Scot Murray, 22, seeded. . . ” but Baltacha is “from north London”.
Actually, she is not. Her current residence is Enfield, but she is from a number of places starting with Kiev, Ipswich and Perth. By the BBC’s logic, Murray should be “Andy Murray from London”. (from Andy Murray’s official website) No one is fighting over Murray, and the BBC’s error only points to their lack of research based on Anglo-centric assumptions.
With Baltacha, it is different. The Herald headlines their article with “Scots duo” referring to Baltacha and Murray. In Tearful Baltacha leads the way, The Scotsman claims her for Scotland, “[i]t was Scotland’s Elena Baltacha who captured the imagination of the Wimbledon crowd”. The Scottish argument is strengthened in the Lawn Tennis Association‘s profile page for Baltacha, where her country is listed as Scotland. The International Tennis Federation and Wimbledon’s own page only mention her Great Britain/ United Kingdom affiliation. Wimbledon’s player profile pages are hardly reliable as English players are listed variously as ‘Great Britain’, ‘England’, or with no listing at all.
Baltacha, herself, does not commit to a unique allegiance to any Home Country in a 2003 Guardian interview.
Born in Kiev, raised in Ipswich and Perth, does she feel Ukrainian, English or Scottish? ‘I feel so this and that and everything mixed together. Just a mix. But it’s lovely because everywhere we’ve been living and staying, we’ve always felt very welcome.’ And she’s happy to represent Britain? ‘Yes, I play for the British flag – I definitely play for the Union Jack.’
Personally, I will not promote the Scottish position as I do not know enough about Baltacha. I would, however, argue for consistency in reporting without bias. Neither are conspicuously present in much of the current coverage of Wimbledon and entirely lacking when discussion Baltacha.