Archive for June 24, 2009

Claiming Elena Baltacha

Murray laments British failings

(from http://news.bbc.co.uk/ 24 June, 2009.)

Not being a tennis buff, I was not aware of any dispute over Elena Baltacha’s nationality. Instead, the BBC’s unbalanced treatment in presenting Andy Murray’s despair at the quality of British tennis talent first drew my attention to a possible identity war over Baltacha. The Beeb define Murray as “Scot Murray, 22, seeded. . . ” but Baltacha is “from north London”.

Actually, she is not. Her current residence is Enfield, but she is from a number of places starting with Kiev, Ipswich and Perth. By the BBC’s logic, Murray should be “Andy Murray from London”. (from Andy Murray’s official website) No one is fighting over Murray, and the BBC’s error only points to their lack of research based on Anglo-centric assumptions.

With Baltacha, it is different. The Herald headlines their article with “Scots duo” referring to Baltacha and Murray. In Tearful Baltacha leads the way, The Scotsman claims her for Scotland, “[i]t was Scotland’s Elena Baltacha who captured the imagination of the Wimbledon crowd”. The Scottish argument is strengthened in the Lawn Tennis Association‘s profile page for Baltacha, where her country is listed as Scotland. The International Tennis Federation and Wimbledon’s own page only mention her Great Britain/ United Kingdom affiliation. Wimbledon’s player profile pages are hardly reliable as English players are listed variously as ‘Great Britain’, ‘England’, or with no listing at all.

Baltacha, herself, does not commit to a unique allegiance to any Home Country in a 2003 Guardian interview.

Born in Kiev, raised in Ipswich and Perth, does she feel Ukrainian, English or Scottish? ‘I feel so this and that and everything mixed together. Just a mix. But it’s lovely because everywhere we’ve been living and staying, we’ve always felt very welcome.’ And she’s happy to represent Britain? ‘Yes, I play for the British flag – I definitely play for the Union Jack.’

Personally, I will not promote the Scottish position as I do not know enough about Baltacha. I would, however, argue for consistency in reporting without bias. Neither are conspicuously present in much of the current coverage of Wimbledon and entirely lacking when discussion Baltacha.

Leave a Comment

Expelling 7-year-olds

Ofsted report reveals data on very young children excluded from school

(from The Times 24 June, 2009.)

Nothing in this Times article overtly points to a location. Readers must then take their clues from the wider context of who published the article. The publishers are based in England, as printed at the bottom of each of their webpages;

This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England

However, rather than address their content to an English audience, The Times uses ‘Britain’ as its standard term for all things UK, as is customary with all of the ‘national’ UK newspapers. The ‘schools’ and ‘local authorities’ in the report are, then, presumed to be British.

The problem with a news article like this is that the primary source is Ofsted, an education authority that only covers England. The other home countries in the UK have their own education departments. News that is presented as British but is in fact only English is a serious misrepresentation of England’s role in the UK and the reporters are guilty of promoting an Anglo-centric view where other member countries in the UK have no right to a voice.

The BBC in covering the same topic, added just two words to their report: “in England”. Not only does this support the journalistic integrity of the article, it avoids condemning entire nations to an invisible status.

Leave a Comment

Peter Tobin

Killing accused ‘murdered before’

(from http://news.bbc.co.uk/ 23 June, 2009.)

Peter Tobin, 62, from Renfrewshire, in Scotland,

Dinah McNicol, of Tillingham, Essex

he had lived in Irvine Drive in Margate, Kent

he abducted Miss Hamilton in Bathgate, near Edinburgh

Miss McNicol had disappeared after attending a music festival at Liphook, Hampshire

What exactly is the status of ‘Renfrewshire’ in the above citations? Is it a town like the other first-placed area names? Well, the suffix ‘shire’ eliminates that option. We know from the lexical meaning of ‘shire’ that it must be a region identifier beyond the scope of a town/ city. However precise the writer was in locating the other town/ city names, Tobin’s home town/ city name is missing. Tobin has, unfortunately, been in the news before, and we know that he is from Johnstone. A quick check by the journalist would have uncovered that information. One assumption might be that both ‘Johnstone’ and ‘Renfrewshire’ are too unknown to English readers that the author chose to rephrase the location in more Anglo-centric friendly terms.

And what about ‘Scotland’? It comes second, mirroring the use of ‘Essex’, ‘Kent’, ‘Edinburgh’ and ‘Hampshire’. Is ‘Scotland’ a region on the same par as, say, ‘Essex’? Clearly it cannot be level with ‘Edinburgh’, and the reader is left totally confused as to the writer’s system of location categorisation.

The presentation of place names should be a simple matter. First comes the town name then the region. If Britain is supposed to be a single county, then following this simple algorithm should not be so difficult. The major difficulty will be in selecting a version of ‘region’.

Deciding on definition of ‘region’ is not that easy to pin down. Should a writer use the UK government’s criterion of nine areas for English regions, the local authority, councils, county, burgh, or any other idiosyncratic categorisation? There are nine regions in England according to the UK Government, but the number of English boroughs and councils is far higher. Scotland has thirty-two unitary authorities, and until 1996, had nine major regions, whose names are still used colloquially today.

The Telegraph maintains uniformity in town name – region nomenclature choosing the Scottish authority region, even if the implication that Scottish authorities are a part of Britain runs entirely contrary to their erstwhile usage of ‘England-as-Britain’. (See Viagra not getting it up in Scotland.)

Tobin, of Johnstone, Renfrewshire, denies murdering Miss McNicol.

Ultimately though, portraying Scotland on a par with, say, the West Midlands or Essex and naming of Scotland as a region of Britain is both Anglo-centric and inaccurate. It is also deeply insulting.

Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.